Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02107
Original file (BC 2014 02107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-02107
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 13 May 2014 be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

During her FA, her abdominals were measured incorrectly at 
36 inches, which resulted in a failure.  She was denied the 
option to be re-taped by another Physical Training Leader (PTL).  
However, she tested three days later on 16 May 2014 and received 
a measurement of 30.5 which led to a satisfactory score.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant.

The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows:

		COMPOSITE
	DATE	SCORE		RATING

	22 November 2011	92.40		EXCELLENT
	29 November 2012	87.30		SATISFACTORY
	23 May 2013	91.80	EXCELLENT
 *13 May 2014	71.40		UNSATISFACTORY
	16 May 2014	88.70		SATISFACTORY

*Contested FA score.







AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states the applicant has 
not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief 
prior to seeking correction of his military records.

IAW AFI 36-2905, dated 21 October 2013, any military member can 
appeal his/her FA via Wing Appeal and subsequently through the 
AF Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of 
discovering an error/injustice.  In this case, the applicant's 
DD Form 149 was signed after 21 October 2013 (signed on 
31 December 2013) and the appeal has not been considered by his 
Wing Commander, nor has it been reviewed by the FAAB; therefore, 
the applicant’s request has not been submitted IAW current Air 
Force guidance.

The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 10 November 2014, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application is timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that the applicant has not exhausted his 
administrative avenues for relief.  We advise the applicant to 
appeal the FA via Wing Appeal and subsequently through the FAAB 
as indicated by the office of primary responsibility.  However, 
should after exhausting her administrative avenue of relief, the 
applicant feel she is still a victim of an error or injustice, 
the applicant may resubmit her application to the Board for 
consideration.







THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02107 in Executive Session on 5 February 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 May 2014, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 June 2014.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 November 2014.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00591

    Original file (BC 2014 00591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00591 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The duplicate and erroneous Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 27 June 2006 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The advisory states that he has not exhausted all available avenues of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03671

    Original file (BC 2014 03671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03671 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 16 Mar 11 and 14 Jul 11 Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03880

    Original file (BC 2014 03880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 26 Jul 13 be corrected to reflect “Satisfactory” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01599

    Original file (BC 2014 01599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01599 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 2 Jul 13 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04187

    Original file (BC 2014 04187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 13 Jan 15, SAF/MRBR afforded the applicant an opportunity to request that his case be administratively closed to pursue the administrative avenues described in the Air Force evaluation below prior to submitting his application to the AFBCMR. The applicant failed to provide an invalidation memorandum from his Unit Commander and he has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. Exhibit D. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05761

    Original file (BC 2013 05761 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, any military member can appeal their FA through a wing-level appeals board and then through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) within two years of discovering the error/injustice. The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Oct 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02030

    Original file (BC 2014 02030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, when an Airman receives four Unsatisfactory FA scores within a 24-month period and a medical records review by a military health care provider has ruled out medical conditions precluding the Airman from achieving a passing score, the Unit Commander must make a discharge or retention recommendation to the separation authority. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05484

    Original file (BC 2013 05484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 30 Jun 10. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01757

    Original file (BC 2014 01757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not yet pursued. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05080

    Original file (BC 2013 05080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05080 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 28 Oct 09 and 19 Jan 10 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In view of this and since...